General Principles and Sector-Specific Rules in European Administrative Laws

In the field of administrative law, there is no systematic body of rules similar to those characteristic of European civil codes. General principles are therefore of fundamental importance. This volume - the sixth in the series concerning the common core of European administrative laws - explores this importance through two strands. Firstly, it examines in detail the relationship between general principles of law, such as due process, and sector-specific rules established by legislative and regulatory provisions, for example in licensing and disciplinary matters. Several questions about the nature of general principles emerge through this analysis. Are general principles about filling gaps? Or do they have a foundational role because they give meaning to the values that are shared by European legal systems, such as respect for the rule of law and for fundamental rights? Secondly, this volume also explores the interaction between commonality and diversity in European administrative law. It considers whether there are shared standards of administrative conduct, including the duty to give reasons, or if there are fundamental differences with regard to non-European legal systems, such as that of China and Venezuela. These questions are investigated through factual analysis, based on a set of hypothetical cases, which are discussed by national experts. This book then scrutinizes these questions to determine how commonality and diversity have extended and interact with one another, within and across legal systems, both diachronically and synchronically, over the course of a century. It shows that there are both unexpected areas of agreement between the European legal systems, notably concerning the right to be heard (expressed by the maxim audi alteram partem) and the duty to give reasons, and there are also areas of disagreement, for example as far as the right to remain silent vis à vis the administration (that is, nemo tenetur se detegere) is concerned.

1 - Introduction
2 - Austria
3 - China
4 - France
5 - Germany
6 - Greece
7 - Italy
8 - Romania
9 - Serbia
10 - Spain
11 - Switzerland
12 - United Kingdom
13 - Venezuela
14 - Cases
15 - About the Way General Principles Combine with Sector-Specific Rules in Administrative Procedural Law
16 - General Principles at the European Level
17 - The Legal Relevance and Significance of Administrative Procedure Legislation
18 - Same Problems, Same Solutions?

Giacinto della Cananea is a professor and leading authority on EU administrative law and comparative administrative law. His publications include six monographs, 20 edited volumes, and over 150 articles and book chapters on national and EU administrative law, global administrative law, and comparative public law. His work is cross-disciplinary, often in cooperation with historians of law, experts of international law (particularly in the field of investment), political scientists and economists, addressing such topics as administrative procedures, judicial review, and regulation. He was awarded the 'Spinelli prize on European integration' in 2017. Jean-Bernard Auby is professor emeritus and director of the Center on Changes in Governance and Public Law, at Sciences Po, Paris. He previously served as Dean of the Law School, University of Paris XII and professor of public law at the University of Paris II-Assas. He also served as Deputy Director of the Institute of European and Comparative Law at Oxford University.