Questo prodotto usufruisce delle SPEDIZIONI GRATIS
selezionando l'opzione Corriere Veloce in fase di ordine.
Pagabile anche con Carta della cultura giovani e del merito, 18App Bonus Cultura e Carta del Docente
The purpose of the book is to elaborate a planning theory which departs from the plethora of theories which reflect the conditions of developed countries of the North-West. The empirical material of this effort is derived from a country, Greece, which sits on the edge between North-West and South-East, at the corner of Europe. No doubt, there is extensive international literature on planning theory in general from a bewildering variety of viewpoints. The interested professional or student of urban and regional planning is certainly aware of the dizzying flood of books, articles and research reports on planning theory and of their never-ending borrowing of obscure concepts from more respectable scientific disciplines, from mathematics to philosophy and from physics to economics, human geography and sociology. He or she probably observed that there is a growing interest in theoretical approaches from the viewpoint of the so-called “Global South”. The author of the present book has for many decades faced the impasse of attempting to transplant theories founded on the experience of the North-West to countries with a totally different historical, political, social and geographical background. He learned that the reality that planners face is unpredictable, patchy, and responsive to social processes, frequently of a very pedestrian nature. Planning strives to deal with private interests which planners are keen to envelop in a single “public interest”, which is extremely hard to define. The behaviour of the average citizen, far from being that of the neoclassical model of the homo economicus, is that of an individual, a kind of homo individualis, who interacts with the state and the public administration within a complex web of mutual dependence and negotiation. The state and its administrative apparatus, i.e., the key-determinants and fixers of urban and regional planning policy, bargain with this individual, offer inducements, exemptions, derogations and privileges, deviate unhesitatingly from their grand policy pronouncements, but still defend the rationality and comprehensiveness of the planning system they have legislated and operationalized. It is by and large a successful modus vivendi, but only thanks to a constant practice of compromise. Hence, the term compromise planning, which the author coined as an alternative to all the existing theoretical forms of planning. This is the sort of planning, and of the accompanying theory, with which he deals in this book. It is the outcome of experience and knowledge accumulated in a long personal journey of academic teaching in England and Greece, research, and professional involvement.
Front matter
Dedication
Foreword
Preface
About the book
Table of contents
About the author
Acronyms
Table of diagrams, figures and text-boxes
Ch.1 Introduction – Defining the problem
Prologue
1.1 Spatial planning
1.2 Space
1.3 Structure of the book
References
PART I: Review of theories
Ch.2 Planning theories: Typologies and overcrowding
Abstract
Prologue
2.1 Origins of planning theory2.2 Urban planning under attack
2.3 Planning theory typologies: Theories in, of, for, on and about planning and Faludi’s legacy
2.4 Planning theory yes, but what about practice?
2.5 The traditions underpinning planning theory and the early John Friedmann2.6 Yiftachel’s typology
2.7 The “communicative” challenge
2.8 Planning theory as textbook material
2.9 Critical stances2.10 An inheritance of confusion
2.11 Towards a more lucid categorization of theories?
2.12 An effort to simplify the prepositional game: Currents of ideas and types of planning
2.13 Charles Hoch’s pragmatism and Ernest Alexander’s contingency modelEpilogue: An opening for a theory of compromise planning?
References
Ch.3 Mainstream theories: The rational and communicative currents
Abstract
Prologue
3.1 The rational current
Key-words
3.1.1 The heritage of rational planning
3.1.2 Rationalism and its critics
3.1.3 Rational planning, its historical roots and its resilient persistence3.1.4 Statutory planning and its rational foundations
3.1.5 Planning, power and the state
3.1.6 Planning’s “scientific” methods and techniques
3.1.7 Systems thinking
3.1.8 Rational planning abandoned, but for how long?
3.2 The communicative currentKey-words
3.2.1 Communicative and collaborative planning
3.2.2 Conceptual foundations
3.2.3 The role of plans and the public interest
3.2.4 Objections to, and weaknesses of, collaborative planning
3.2.5 Uneasy similarities of communicative and rational planning
3.2.6 Complementarities and integration of theories
3.3 Pragmatism
Epilogue
References
Ch.4 Theoretical challenges: The radical current and Southern theory
Abstract
Prologue
4.1 The radical current
Key-words
4.1.1 The radical turn
4.1.2 Planners, activism and transformative planning
4.1.3 Ethics and justice
4.1.4 Planning for development
4.1.5 Informal planning4.1.6 Militant planning for change
4.1.7 Movements: Feminism and “othering”
4.1.8 Agonism and antagonism
4.2 Southern theory
4.3 Neoliberalism
Epilogue
References
Ch.5 The “climate” current: Environmental concerns in the Anthropocene age
Abstract
Prologue
Key-words
5.1 Climate change and planning in simple language5.2 Environment, sustainability, and first steps towards a climate current theory
5.3 Risks and resilience
5.4 Being in the Anthropocene age
5.5 A Greek example
Epilogue
References
PART II: Greece as a case study
Ch.6 Greece: On the edge of North and South – A historical perspective
Abstract
Prologue
6.1 Independence and dependence, nationalism, and the Bavarians
6.2 National lands, first development efforts, bankruptcies and defeats
6.3 Social classes, Greeks of the diaspora, emerging elite and cities
6.4 The Asia Minor disaster and the influx of refugees
6.5 Second World War, German occupation, and Civil War
6.6 Development and reconstruction
6.7 Stability, affluence, and renewed crisis
Epilogue
References
Ch. 7 The state as a crucial parameter for the interpretation of planning
Abstract
Prologue
7.1 The formation of the nation state
7.2 The size of the state
7.3 Legislation
7.4 State, populism and patronage
7.5 Societal attitudes and the state-society nexus
Epilogue
References
Ch. 8 The Greek planning system: A case study at the tip of the Balkan peninsula
Abstract
Prologue
8.1 The legacy of the past and its impact on planning
8.2 First steps of town planning
8.3 Ground-breaking town planning legislation in the interwar period
8.4 The unfinished decade of the 1960s and the emergence of regional planning
8.5 Athens
8.6 Regional development
8.7 Network of urban centres
8.8 Planning legislation in the 1970s and 1980s and the Operation of Town Planning Reorganization
8.9 Realities on the ground and out-of-plan building activity8.10 Legal quandaries
8.11 European Union
8.12 Resuscitation of regional spatial planning in the 1990s and new planning instruments
8.13 The apogee of external pressure after the economic crisis and the parallel system of planning
8.14 The rational and hierarchical edifice of Greek planning
8.15 Spatial planning, environment and natural disasters
Epilogue: New challenges and the danger of déjà vu
References
Part III: A theory of compromise planning
Ch.9 Planners, knowledge transfer, planning culture: Looking for a new theory
Abstract
Prologue
9.1 A personal journey
9.2 A précis of conditions in Greece and imported planning tools
9.3 The profile of planners
9.4 The culture of planning and the Greek peculiarity
9.5 Greece: A sui generis case?
9.6 Compromise, collaboration, pragmatism and improvisation
9.7 Basis for a theoretical model
Epilogue
References
Ch. 10 Compromise planning and homo individualis
Abstract
PrologueKey-words
10.1 The solace of pragmatism
10.2 A native Greek theoretical debate
10.3 Homo economicus and homo socialis
10.4 Critical realism, places and fables
10.5 More homines, structure and human agents
10.6 The person next door: Homo individualis
10.7 Bac? to the task of building a planning theory: The Greek planning model
10.8 The public interest as a planning compass10.9 Spatial planning
10.10 Rationality and exceptionalism
10.11 The theorist and the theoretical model
EpilogueReferences
Ch.11 Conclusions: The parallel worlds of planning - Variants of compromise
Abstract
Prologue11.1 Janus-faced compromise
11.2 The state and its pivotal role
11.3 The ugly face of planning and hopes for the future
11.4 The construction of a theoretical framework
Epilogue
References
Index
Il sito utilizza cookie ed altri strumenti di tracciamento che raccolgono informazioni dal dispositivo dell’utente. Oltre ai cookie tecnici ed analitici aggregati, strettamente necessari per il funzionamento di questo sito web, previo consenso dell’utente possono essere installati cookie di profilazione e marketing e cookie dei social media. Cliccando su “Accetto tutti i cookie” saranno attivate tutte le categorie di cookie. Per accettare solo deterninate categorie di cookie, cliccare invece su “Impostazioni cookie”. Chiudendo il banner o continuando a navigare saranno installati solo cookie tecnici. Per maggiori dettagli, consultare la Cookie Policy.